| Deviant Login | Shop | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
| Photography / People & Portraits / Classic Portraits | ©2009-2013 ~azrael-x64 |
Tranquility End of the road white.
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `anmari has been spreading her infectious positivity throughout our community for over 6 years. Throughout this time Ana has been at the core of all things devious, passionately developing an eclectic gallery, helping organise devmeets, participating in chat events and also recently completed dedicating her time as a Community Volunteer. We are absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for May 2013 to `anmari, congratulations! Read More
|
Sta.sh
it's sharp, contrasty, with good saturation, fast and precise AF, moderately good depth of field capabilities (see the more expensive f/2.8 version or much faster primes) and looks very professional (great for impressing clients; especially as a young photographer such as myself), oh and... very important it's a telephoto zoom
The AF is so good that I only have 2 out of focus photos that I don't think were my fault (meaning they were shot at high shutter speed) on a 450D body, on a 20D body as of now I don't have any oof that weren't my fault.
I'd recomend using it on a body with very good high iso capabilities though (400-800-1600) because if you want to use it for portraiture (what I'm using it for) you'll encounter lots of locations without too much light and you need fast shutter speed to keep the photo sharp (get the IS version if you can, you get IS, weather sealing that completely seals with a filter and it's the sharpest zoom ever made by Canon).
On my 450D the high iso destroys image quality on this lens at iso 800 and iso 1600, it's really a pitty, because on iso 100-200-400 everything looks fuckin awesome. On 20D it's a different story, even at 1600, if processed carefully it still looks awesome.
Anyway, this was intended as a quick reply but I got carried away
(is yours heavier thank all get out too?)
the f/2.8 version is twice as heave as the f/4, I actually consider that a feature compared to the f/2.8
Am o intrebare... zici ca ai 200 L? focalizeaza repede si precis
? adik in asa conditii nu tindea sa ia in focus masa de fulgi care cadeau?
e Canon 70-200 f/4 L USM si e foarte tare, sharp, culori misto, daca aveam bani sa-l iau cu IS era za ultimate shit la pret/performanta